Saturday, September 21, 2019

THE PRESIDNT HAS ASSENTED TO THE RENT ACT 2014, SOME OF FOROYAA’s PROPOSALS ALREADY TAKEN CARE OF BUT—

on

that he had been asked to go back to receive moneys he had already paid, because the proceedings took place under the 2010 Act which has already been repealed.This compelled us to go to the Printers to find out whether the Rent Act had been enacted and gazetted. A review of the Act reveals that it is now the Minister of Justice, and not the Mayors and Governors, who appoints Chairpersons of Rent Tribunals after consultation with the Chief Justice, but that the Chairperson must be a first class magistrate. Obviously, good laws are made to avoid ambiguity and cumbersomeness. A Magistrate is part of the Judiciary.  It should have been left to the Chief Justice to appoint Magistrates to serve as Chairpersons of Rent Tribunals. The Public Service Commission should have been left to appoint the rest of the members. The Registrars of the expiring Magistrate’s Courts should have continued to serve the tribunals instead of a Minister appointing the Registrar.A Rent tribunal is not a Commission of enquiry but a court. Hence the freer the court is from political influence, the more independent it becomes.It is a welcome reform that appeal from the tribunal shall lie with the high court. ]]>

Must Read

NCCE Engage Citizens on Tolerance, Reconciliation

By Mustapha JallowThe National Council for Civic Education (NCCE) in partnership with ECOWAS, on Saturday September 14th 2019, started an eight-day national dialogue on...

The Diplomatic Passport Saga

13,103FansLike
1,037FollowersFollow